I, like everybody else on the face of the earth, read the
Hunger Games trilogy and waited
patiently anxiously for the movie's release. Clay took me to see it on Friday and as expected, it did not disappoint.
While I think it was a great movie overall, there are a few key things that caught my attention.
POSSIBLE SPOILER ALERT(S)

I'm not sure the filmmakers painted an accurate portrait of how controlled the Districts are. Yes, at the beginning of the movie, we saw Katniss going to elaborate lengths to get through the fence, but it's not clear that hunting is illegal. The only way they showed the oppression is through the Hunger Games and there is so much more to it. For those who haven't read the books (like my husband), the rebellion didn't quite make sense.

Katniss purchasing the pin in the Hob bothered me. I appreciate that they made it a token of special meaning between Katniss and Prim, but I'm not sure they played up the importance of the symbol enough, considering what it comes to mean later in the series.

Back to the rebellion- I realize they used the rebellion after Rue's death as foreshadowing; however, it severely crippled the double suicide scene, in my opinion. Clay didn't see covering Rue's body as an act of rebellion and just assumed the man who started the rebellion was Rue's dad and he was just ticked about her death. Perhaps inserting the rebellion that early in the movie would have worked better had the audience understood more clearly that the districts were severely oppressed; however, I still believe they should have begun the rebellion after Katniss pulls the stunt with the nightlock, especially considering President Snow puts the rebellion on her shoulders in
Catching Fire.

I am firmly on Team Peeta. Only for a fleeting moment in
Catching Fire did that change. (You know what I'm referring to? ha) I'm a romantic, so I love every part of the connection between Katniss and Peeta. I love that Katniss thinks of Peeta fondly because he burned bread that fed her family, even though she doesn't know him well; I love that he is so hopefully devoted to her; most of all, I love the "love" story that becomes a true love story. Because the book is written using Katniss' thoughts, it is abundantly clear that she is using the star-crossed lover story to her advantage in the games but is also experiencing an emotional conflict. In the movie, it's a bit harder to do that- I get that. I just wish they would have said more on the train ride back to District 12.

As far as casting goes, I was thrilled with Katniss, Prim, Caesar Flickman and Gale from the very beginning. Seriously, could Stanley Tucci have done a better job with Caesar's character?? At first, I wasn't so hot about Peeta's character, but warmed up to him and ended up agreeing with the choice at the end. The two I have a hard time getting behind are President Snow and Haymitch.
The book the picture drew of President Snow, at least in my opinion, was much different. Donald Sutherland did a great job, but what threw me was his hair. I see President Snow being very demure with slicked back hair and in the best suits. It's a small thing, but his wild hair just really threw me for a loop.
When I first saw the trailer, Woody Harrelson as Haymitch surprised me. In the book, Haymitch falls off the stage at the reaping and is constantly drunk. To me, that means slurred speech and generally unable to conduct himself properly. Woody did a great job with the role, but I would have like to see him a bit more disheveled, not just dependent on alcohol.
All in all, I loved the movie and am ready to see it again. I already reread
Hunger Games and
Catching Fire (and am halfway through
Mockingjay) last week in anticipation of the movie. Now, how do I waste time until the next release in the fall of 2013????
What did
you think about the movie?
Just think, once Bryson gets here, I bet the time will fly until the next movie!
ReplyDeleteI agree that the rebellion doesn't make much sense in the film. They stayed pretty true to the book, but I think they barely scratched the surface of how horrible things were, how violent the games were, how much starvation was in District 12. Tim didn't even realize Katniss was starving in the bread scene. Also, NO mention of District 13? Interesting to see how they approach that in the coming films.
Did you know that Lenny Kravitz played Cinna?!
I kept staring at Cinna thinking he looked familiar and it finally came to me who he was. I thought it was weird he was black. I never saw him black in my head. He did a good job and he has that suave look to him that I saw Cinna having.
ReplyDeleteI loved it! Was it as good as the book? No. They had to leave stuff out. However, compared to the vast majority of adaptations, they were able to stay really true to the book!
ReplyDeleteI was sad they had to leave out Katniss getting the bread from District 11 as well as other things.
I agree so much!! The rebellion didn't occur until after the berries, haymitch was a sloppy drunk in the book, yet wasn't shown that way. There were several details they left out that upset me, but overall, I think the movie was very well done! especially compared to some others
ReplyDeleteI completely agree about the mockingjay pin. It's such a big part of the next 2 books, and her connection to Madge and Madge to her mother, and of course being the symbol of the rebellion. I'm pretty shocked that they changed that so much.
ReplyDeleteI also agree with the rebellion scenes. Having seen the movie prior to reading the 1st book, I too initially thought it was just Rue's father's reaction to her death, and not a true uprising.
I find it a little odd too that they didn't follow Suzanne Collin's specific descriptions of some of the clothing/looks. Totally a minute detail in the grand scheme of things, but it's painted for you right there in the text, why not use it? (ex Effie's dress is described as Green during the reapings, not purple, and Katniss' dress during her interview with Ceasar is totally different in the movie.
I thought they missed the main theme of the movie throughout - hunger. They didn't go into this at all, the bread scene with Peeta was portrayed in a way that she just looked wet and cold, not starving and they didn't overindulge on the train or say anything about it. The movie also lacked a feeling of desperation, which I thought the book had. The fire was so bad when they first came out and it makes me mad because we spend a ton of money on really crappy movies but couldn't get better CGI fire for this one? It was just ok to me, really wish it could have been rated R (because the book was so violent compared) but I know that it couldn't be for the kids. :)
ReplyDelete